- Joined
- Feb 4, 2006
- Messages
- 2,435
- Purraise
- 61
Just want to touch on a few of the many points being discussed:
Yes, certainly, cats can have negative reactions to the same protein source processed in different ways; most often, as FurryFriends said, it's to the highly processed version. As Mschuer highlighted, part of the problem is that important enzymes and other nutrients naturally present in flesh and organs are destroyed or altered in commercial processing.
I second Mschauer on the organs, too. Even at a full 25% of the diet, Koobe, you don't need to make them a part of the raw foods offered. And I would be especially leery of offering liver until and unless you go fully raw, as it is a primary source of Vit A, which is also provided (to varying and unknown degrees) by the commercial products. Vit A is not water soluble and you don't want to overfeed it.
It's been my experience that folks who go to the lengths required to feed raw also do the necessary research to understand it, and I personally know of no full-time raw feeder who does not comprehend the extreme importance of a full and balanced menu.
However, Yosemite's caution is well-placed - folks new to the raw-feeding concept do need to have that importance impressed upon them. Feeding raw is absolutely not rocket science and there is not one person on this board who isn't fully capable of understanding it - but it does require research, understanding and a commitment to detail.
Sounds to me like you're on the right track, Koobe. Just keep digging until you get all the information you need!
BTW, Leslie - thank you for clarifying my descriptions. Obviously, I was trying to be overly-specific and lost the forest for the trees.
Yes, certainly, cats can have negative reactions to the same protein source processed in different ways; most often, as FurryFriends said, it's to the highly processed version. As Mschuer highlighted, part of the problem is that important enzymes and other nutrients naturally present in flesh and organs are destroyed or altered in commercial processing.
I second Mschauer on the organs, too. Even at a full 25% of the diet, Koobe, you don't need to make them a part of the raw foods offered. And I would be especially leery of offering liver until and unless you go fully raw, as it is a primary source of Vit A, which is also provided (to varying and unknown degrees) by the commercial products. Vit A is not water soluble and you don't want to overfeed it.
It's been my experience that folks who go to the lengths required to feed raw also do the necessary research to understand it, and I personally know of no full-time raw feeder who does not comprehend the extreme importance of a full and balanced menu.
However, Yosemite's caution is well-placed - folks new to the raw-feeding concept do need to have that importance impressed upon them. Feeding raw is absolutely not rocket science and there is not one person on this board who isn't fully capable of understanding it - but it does require research, understanding and a commitment to detail.
Sounds to me like you're on the right track, Koobe. Just keep digging until you get all the information you need!
BTW, Leslie - thank you for clarifying my descriptions. Obviously, I was trying to be overly-specific and lost the forest for the trees.