I checked on that lawsuit. It came in response to the company suing the former employee for leaking trade secrets to the government, and both suits were settled out of court, which means that there's no way to know how it would have gone in an actual trial.It was not designed to go to more than 1300 meters, and they were well below that. The Titanic is at 4000 meters. Ocean pressure caused it to implode, so fast that they would not have even had time to register that anything was wrong. What utterly ticks me off is that one of the mechanical engineers brought up several safety concerns, and was fired for his pains. This was probably avoidable.
Since the company was complaining that he'd leaked their trade secrets to the government, it sounds like he tried to go over their heads after he was fired, which implies that he was telling the truth about what happened. The fact that both suits settled out of court probably (IMO) means that neither side felt certain about winning in an actual trial, and the former employee was willing to settle because he didn't have deep enough pockets to continue. And all of that is speculation. There really is no way to know how it would have gone in an actual trial. But after the amount of money the Coast Guard just spent on a rescue attempt I expect there to be some new legislation requiring safety standards for tourist excursions.
Margret