- Thread Starter Thread Starter
- #41
- Joined
- Oct 3, 2021
- Messages
- 455
- Purraise
- 483
That's a very good question, and one I currently don't have an answer for. It's one of the things I hope to find out tomorrow from the vet friend of my doctor friend who said he will look into this, and what kind of testing we should to to cover everyone.The other conundrum is that IF your cats are not currently shedding the virus, would that also come across as a cat who has never been infected before? In other words, how can one actually tell if a cat has previously been infected if the tests rely on shedders vs. non-shedders???? And, to your point, can a non-shedding cat that tests negative actually be 're-infected' to cause shedding?
I am sorry for throwing so many speculations at you, but you seem to have the ear of some who appear to be 'in the know'.
It seems likely they can be reinfected if they manage to clear the virus. There are differing views on the percentage of cats that become chronic shedders, but most studies and research papers I've read are somewhere around 13-15 percent. Many researchers are now actually saying maybe intermittent shedding isn't a thing, but rather a consequence of reinfection. Although other studies have shown cats to shed on day one, not on day two, then again on day three. So there are again differing views.
To the other questions, mine were tested for antibodies via blood test to see if they'd come in contact with it before. This is another thing I'm hoping to get more insight into from that vet friend, as they've been indoor cats for years now, so I'm wondering how meaningful an antibody test can really be in that case.