Is one way better than the other for a cat who likes to eat both ways? Whether you buy raw food that is already made up or DIY with your own meat and regardless of what supplements you use (if any), how did you decide the best way to feed your cats?
Kind of the same thing that happened to me, but I gave them meat to give them the benefits of chewing..... then that was it...... bye bye ground - they said nope, thank you, but no thank you :lol3:My cats decided. First I noticed they did better on the foods without veggies, and there aren't a lot of commercial raw options without that 5% "other stuff." I was using Nature's Variety, and it targets 15% bone content. That was too much for my kitties (they were getting constipated, which too much calcium can do), so I started giving them some slices of just meat to "thin out" the ratio of meat:bone they were eating. Then three of the boys decided they no longer wanted to eat ground food.
So I had no choice but to move to frankenprey if I wanted them to eat raw. Once I made the switch, I really enjoyed having the complete control over their diet.
Me, personally? I don't feed raw. Or not enough raw to have to worry about calcium anyway. Yet. I'm working up to it. I sort of like that Bengal guy's recipe. If I feed all raw it has to be ground and all mixed together because otherwise I have no way of making sure everyone gets the proper amounts of organs and calcium. Anyhoo, if I can find a way to go all raw I'll decide what calcium to use then. I'd probably go with some ground bone, some eggshell, some MCHA. . .variety is best!How do you give your cats calcium?
Why? What do you think the difference is? Because as I see.... And I feed the same diet as Laurie.... pretty much..... is that the meat is served in chunks.... aside from that...... there is not much difference really :dk:I agree with you doing it Laurie's way would be too risky (no offense to her).
Shoot.... the worst for me would be to transition them - what a nightmare to even think about it :lol3:If I only had one cat, or 2 or 3, or maybe even 8 (like Laurie), I could feed chunks with supplements/organs/etc. But I'm really not willing to feed 21 cats individually. I could, I'm sure, but I don't wanna :tongue2:. So I'd have no way of knowing who ate the liver and who licked the calcium off, etc. So I want everything mixed together so each cat gets a balanced meal. But if you feed your cats individually, why is it riskier? They're eating everything they should be eating, what does it matter if it's ground or not?
Yeah..... that's what happened to Lucky..... 35 days to even lick.... At first if it was even on her plate she would RUN from it :doh3:Haha! I've been feeding raw as a "treat" for a while now, and most of them seem to at least recognize it as food now. There might be one or 2 holdouts---Silka (the bedroom cat) seems especially resistant but she actually ate some pre-made raw tonight! You offer it every night and they kind of get used to it, then one time they decide to take a bite. . .
Let's just say I'm more hopeful.
The difference is Laurie needs to chop it up herself, then add the supplements. I want all of that work to be done for me to prevent the risks of doing it wrong.Why? What do you think the difference is? Because as I see.... And I feed the same diet as Laurie.... pretty much..... is that the meat is served in chunks.... aside from that...... there is not much difference really.
But then you're trusting other people to balance it for you. . .and then you run into the same problem as with commercial cooked foods--how much do you trust those other people to do it right?The difference is Laurie needs to chop it up herself, then add the supplements. I want all of that work to be done for me to prevent the risks of doing it wrong.
Increased chance of not giving them the right amounts of all nutrients they need when I start out. If you did not know you need lots of veggies, a little bit of meat, and no desserts, would you eat a lot of hamburgers and cookies and avoid salad bars?But then you're trusting other people to balance it for you. . .and then you run into the same problem as with commercial cooked foods--how much do you trust those other people to do it right?
Yes, pre-made is easier. Most people startwith it for that reason. But why say that frankenprey is "riskier"?
And how many people in the U.S. do just that? Eat a lot of carbs or protein and few fruits and veggies? Quite a few, given 40% of us are "obese."Increased chance of not giving them the right amounts of all nutrients they need when I start out. If you did not know you need lots of veggies, a little bit of meat, and no desserts, would you eat a lot of hamburgers and cookies and avoid salad bars?
IMHO the issue here is not that is riskier, or more dangerous.... the issue here, is that you don't want to put on the work, and the time to get to know enough about the diet. IMHO this is the isse.... You want to do it the easy way..... Nothing wrong with that.... But it is not about the risks - it is about the work, IMHO.The difference is Laurie needs to chop it up herself, then add the supplements. I want all of that work to be done for me to prevent the risks of doing it wrong.
The only supplement I add that they need to meet AAFCO is calcium. And that's because I don't use bone.The difference is Laurie needs to chop it up herself, then add the supplements. I want all of that work to be done for me to prevent the risks of doing it wrong.
As the others have pointed out, the only difference is that Carolina and I balance at mealtime, not preparing the food in advance.The only way I would ever feed raw is already ground up so I have nothing to worry about. I agree with you doing it Laurie's way would be too risky (no offense to her).
OMG I just noticed I am a Super Cat now! Is 700 the minimum for that title?