As mentioned she isn't fully bengal she is a mix indeed, and her features do not match that of a DSH brown mackerel tuxedo tabby at all. But thanks for your input for sure.
People will often lie about the father of a litter with a moggy mother to make the kittens worth more. Falsifying documents is also common. Reputable breeders wouldn’t cross a fertile male Bengal with a non-Bengal outside of the scope of the development of a new breed — there’s a reason people here are often skeptical of supposed Bengal crosses.
Looks exactly like a Tuxedo/Bengal cross we have in our Bengal club..yes..Bengals can have white on them and often do.
That is sad that some breeders lie. I will say though that her cat looks way more Bengal than the cat in the photo you posted who definitely does not look Bengal. I don't think her cat resembles your cat in patterns, face or build. However, the face, head, ears of her cat def look Bengal. I would need to see more pics of her standing to see her build, but remember she is a mix so she doesn't need to look identical to a Bengal to be part Bengal.
This is just blatantly not true, outside of mixes — high dominant white markings are pretty much always indicative of a mix outside of approved breeds, either in foundation F1-G3 or with later generation established Bengals, as white is considered a fault in the breed standard. Bengals will, rarely, have white crop up, due to some of the breeds used in their foundation, but it’ll always be minimal white, like a bit in the toes, or a locket on the chest that doesn’t have a genetic dominant link. This isn’t desirable, either, so good breeders will typically make an effort to rid their lines of it.
from CFA
From TICA
Maurey
I think you two are both saying the same thing in different ways. 
I was correcting the idea that white on bengals was common (eta to clarify — white spotting doesn’t occur in bengals. Lockets and other minimal white can happen as a fault, and near-white base colours, like with snows, do happen). It can happen in pedigrees, but that’s exceedingly rare and undesirable, so bred away from. True Bengal mixes with white, and not mislabeled tabbies, are rare, and commonly BYB, though the occasional oops litter does happen.
Silver Crazy said that Bengals 'can have white on them' which is true as they technically can have white. She doesn't mention how much white, just that they can. Someone (in general) may look at photos of Bengals and notice some white here and there on them and think that Bengals can have white on them.
You, of course, are talking about the breed standard which as you know does not allow for any substantial white or any white at all on specific parts of the body.
Yes, but pet quality cats from a good breeder still look like the breed, and will match a lot of the breed standard — they’ll just have a few minor faults that wouldn’t matter to pet owners, like poor rosettes or wrong colour tone. Plus, a pet quality cat shouldn’t be used for stud — imo a breed quality cat’s offspring would look more like the breed, even if the queen was a domestic.
Also, I believe that if a kitty in a pure bred litter does not match a breed standard, it does not mean it is any less that particular breed, just that it might not be show quality.
Maurey
I see what you mean, and you are teaching very valuable information about breed standards! In the world of Bengals, Bengals are not thought of as having white even if there is a tiny bit in accepted regions. 
I just hope I was able to explain how / why an amateur, intermediate and an expert could potentially describe the same cat differently. 
