When Benji had his first blood tests and ultrasound his liver seemed swollen and his numbers were high so the vet thought there was problem with the liver. After a week he had the blood tests again and the liver seemed ok his numbers had dropped to normal. Before he had spoken to me about biopsy but he told me it would take two weeks for the results and he then thought he didn't have two weeks to live so even he said not to do it. Which was a good choice as the liver eventually was not the problem. Now, I wouldn't trust a vet who once says the results are accurate 90% and then 60%. For 60% accuracy no I wouldn't want my cat to go through surgery I am sorry. And to tell you the truth, I have heard so much and in this world we live in where money is thought to be god for some people, I don't trust them that much as even with humans they take advantage of your pain only to gain more. Now, I am not saying this is the case with you, maybe I just don't trust people that much. But again I wouldn't want my cat to go through surgery for 60% accuracy of results. So if they don't find this, what are they going to send you to do to the poor animal. And I wonder, with cats hiding their illness and probably their pain, with inaccurate results as with stress sometimes the results are altered and cats are easily stressed, with patients who don't speak, how can they really tell? Many a times, they can't as my vet told me and they experiment until they find the issue or the right cure. Ok, I can take that but not as long as my pet goes through something which is going to cause more stress to him or her.
Of course the choice is yours I am just stating my opinion here.
Of course the choice is yours I am just stating my opinion here.
