- Joined
- Jan 31, 2008
- Messages
- 1,951
- Purraise
- 12
I wasn't being argumentative. Not adopting to someone without an income is not a stupid reason. I've lived off of savings before; the money doesn't last forever and vet bills can get quite expensive. Nova was $1000+ the first year I had her from various minor illnesses. Grim was $1000+ this year because he had a tumor that needed to be removed.Originally Posted by Degu_2009
Because I didn't want to argue with you. Shelters complain about being full of cats yet they refuse to let people adopt for stupid reasons. He is looking for work and he has plenty of money. It's apparent he has money because somehow he can pay rent and bills and buy food, ect....
He wants to give this cat a good home, that's all. It's not like he has bad intentions. Shelter's are full of animals they can't get rid of yet they have strict rules like this, it's very silly to me.
You and your friend can disagree until you're blue in the face, but that isn't going to get him the cat he wants. (Isn't that the main issue? Getting angry at the rescue isn't going to solve anything.)
I don't see what the problem is with your friend looking for work and adopting the cat when he meets the shelter's requirements. I'm assuming the cat is not in danger of being euthanized? Yes, it does stink that he had his heart set on a cat and was rejected. However, getting someone else to adopt the cat for him is an immature way to go about it. Obviously, the rescue took an interest in him as a prospective owner or they wouldn't have bothered to call him back.
If they were rude to him, that's a separate issue from why he was rejected. If the rescue is run by private funding, then your friend's lack of income is a legitimate reason not to adopt to him; a person without income is less likely to provide for the cat for the duration of her life. They are looking out for the best interest of the cat.