Not necessarily.Kibble contains pathogens most of the time too.
I'm researching the topic right now for a new article. Kibble may contain bacteria but it should not contain salmonella, listeria and other bacteria which are pathogenic to humans. Dry pet food is monitored and if they find a batch that contains salmonella - which certainly does happen occasionally - there's a recall. The policy - at least in the US - is to have zero salmonella in dry pet food.
On the other hand, there's no such policy when it comes to raw meat. Raw meat - particularly chicken - is almost always contaminated with some amount of pathogens. Apparently, the way animals are grown for meat just makes it unlikely that they stay free of pathogens.
Feeding raw meat - particularly chicken - in your home means you raise the level of pathogens in it. Your cat will ingest salmonella and in all likelihood will shed some of that around too (even if you keep things very clean). So how come people who feed raw aren't sick all the time? Well, some do get sick. And some dogs and cats get sick too. There are several case studies in the literature of raw-fed pets with salmonella infection and also of humans contracting salmonella after feeding raw. That said, most healthy individuals - human and cats - will not show symptoms when infected with a small amount of salmonella. Our immune system can handle a certain load of the bacteria (there are actually very specific numbers as to much you can ingest before becoming sick).
The problem begins when people don't take these pathogens seriously and don't follow the very strict rules of handling and feeding raw meat. Also, people and cats who are already immunocompromised (that includes babies, pregnant women and the elderly) are more at risk for developing a symptomatic infection.
There's a very impressive body of evidence - both case studies and actual studies - that demonstrate the risk of feeding raw. Sure, you can mostly get away with it if you and your cats are young and healthy and you follow the safety guidelines in a very strict way. It's still unsafe as a recommendation for the general population and that's why the AVMA and other organizations go against it.
I don't want to give more spoilers for the article
To get back to the kibble point. Yes, sometimes kibble is contaminated with pathogens. It shouldn't be but it does happen occasionally and you could get exposed to pathogens before they discover it and issue a recall. That said, the odds are much lower with kibble compared to raw meats. Moreover, salmonella doesn't multiply very well in dry kibble yet will multiply like crazy in unrefrigerated raw meat. Overall, put kibble in one bowl and put your best-sourced raw chicken in another. Half an hour later, your chances of avoiding a salmonella infection are far better with the kibble.
Last edited: