I was reading another article about a man shooting a neighbor's cat. The cat was on the shooter's property. He says he was 'teaching the owners a lesson' for them violating the restraint law.
"According to the ordinance, a cat is considered restrained if it is on a leash, confined or has been desexed and declawed, reducing its wanderings to the immediate area of its residence."
The cat that was shot had been neutered and wasn't declawed, so technically was not in line with the restrain law.
My concern is requiring a cat to be declawed if it goes outside? Who makes these laws? It's a lack of responsibility to not know the physical and psychological repercussions of declawing cats, and they are making it a law! Wow.
"According to the ordinance, a cat is considered restrained if it is on a leash, confined or has been desexed and declawed, reducing its wanderings to the immediate area of its residence."
The cat that was shot had been neutered and wasn't declawed, so technically was not in line with the restrain law.
My concern is requiring a cat to be declawed if it goes outside? Who makes these laws? It's a lack of responsibility to not know the physical and psychological repercussions of declawing cats, and they are making it a law! Wow.