- Joined
- Dec 1, 2021
- Messages
- 327
- Purraise
- 432
I don't know if this thread would be better suited for the social section of the forum, but since it's related to nutrition...
I'm at my wit's end with veterinary care. My kitten currently has two vets, who are mildly in agreement with one another regarding food (but not so much regarding treatment), but what they say doesn't fall in line with what I've been researching online, what I've read here on the forums or on facebook groups for cats with digestive issues. Case in point: problems related with dry food have never come up, none of the probiotics they ever recommended has the bacteria I've read about that's actually helpful, they always recommend Pro Plan or Royal Canin and that's about it.
Now, my mother was doing me a favor by going by a pet store to get some wet food - I've made the decision to start the transition out of dry food - and the vet that works there advised against the one I had chosen, which was Royal Canin Kitten - because my kitten already knows it and he didn't have any symptoms when most of his food intake was based on it. Also, because this chart by catinfo.org shows it has a decent ratio of protein, fat and carbs. The vet at the store essentially started complaining about the level of sodium it has - which is fair, I suppose, but they then recommended another one that was primarily fish based. Doesn't that have more sodium, naturally? It was by a popular brand too, but now I'm not sure if it was Friskies or another one.
Mind you, none of them are nutritionists. But the one nutritionist I found works for Farmina (granted, everyone seems to love that brand and it does seem interesting, but is it okay to work with a professional that's so obviously biased right off the bat?).
Anyway, I honestly needed to rant. I hate to be that person that reads stuff online and tries to argue with professionals, as I respect them so much. But if they all say different things, how am I supposed to make a decision?
I'm at my wit's end with veterinary care. My kitten currently has two vets, who are mildly in agreement with one another regarding food (but not so much regarding treatment), but what they say doesn't fall in line with what I've been researching online, what I've read here on the forums or on facebook groups for cats with digestive issues. Case in point: problems related with dry food have never come up, none of the probiotics they ever recommended has the bacteria I've read about that's actually helpful, they always recommend Pro Plan or Royal Canin and that's about it.
Now, my mother was doing me a favor by going by a pet store to get some wet food - I've made the decision to start the transition out of dry food - and the vet that works there advised against the one I had chosen, which was Royal Canin Kitten - because my kitten already knows it and he didn't have any symptoms when most of his food intake was based on it. Also, because this chart by catinfo.org shows it has a decent ratio of protein, fat and carbs. The vet at the store essentially started complaining about the level of sodium it has - which is fair, I suppose, but they then recommended another one that was primarily fish based. Doesn't that have more sodium, naturally? It was by a popular brand too, but now I'm not sure if it was Friskies or another one.
Mind you, none of them are nutritionists. But the one nutritionist I found works for Farmina (granted, everyone seems to love that brand and it does seem interesting, but is it okay to work with a professional that's so obviously biased right off the bat?).
Anyway, I honestly needed to rant. I hate to be that person that reads stuff online and tries to argue with professionals, as I respect them so much. But if they all say different things, how am I supposed to make a decision?
Last edited: