- Joined
- Apr 14, 2018
- Messages
- 2,844
- Purraise
- 3,465
This thread isn’t talking about donating profits, it’s talking about the quality of food. The ingredients here are not a departure from the norm. They explicitly state on their website that cats should eat 40% dry food...Funny that there are two very different opinions on the very same fact. How can you possibly say that there is not much difference from other pet food companies ?! Out of 100s companies that make pet food can you name another one that gives 100% of their profit to animal causes ? If you can I'd like to know the name, but if you can't you are expressing your opinion, not actual facts.
Here are other facts:
Other pet food companies have been on the news for animal cruelty this one is listed on the peta website for being cruelty free >>> Search for Cruelty-Free Companies, Products, and More | PETA
It is also inaccurate when you write that they are encouraging dry food for cats. Almo Nature was the first company in the world to introduce a wet pet food line in 2000 after that every other company copied them, but Almo uses ingredients fit for human consumption. The dry food line followed afterward.
Canned wet food has been around since before 2000. It’s actually been around longer than dry food.
Their website states the ingredients were “originally” fit for human consumption. It’s a clever play on words. We actually don’t know what the quality of the foods were at the time they were used to make the food. And on what basis are they making this claim? The website makes a lot of claims about the quality of the food but unfortunately without a proper regulating body these claims are essentially meaningless. Anyone can throw around terms like “organic” and it can mean nothing.
Last edited: