- Joined
- Dec 19, 2004
- Messages
- 8,151
- Purraise
- 1,146
I agree with you Loveysmummy. it's just so darn cruel!!!!
She wouldn't be fined if her dog was inside the house.Originally Posted by catsallover
and been fined numerous times for having a nuisance dog- don't you want to take him home?
I really can't blame her in her case for having it done- her dog does have a loving owner and a good home, otherwise she wouldn't have tried so long,and so many things to avoid having to go to that extreme.
Her dog is in the house, not left outside except for playtime and walks. We are not talking about a dog who barks at squirrels and the mailman and people walking in front of the house- this is a dog who barked constantly just to bark, until she was so hoarse that you simply couldn't hear her anymore, though she was continuing to "bark" , and then the next day, start again. This was not normal behavior- there was something wrong with this dog mentally, and she could not get her past it. The people who run my dog forum are rescuers and many members are breeders- no one disagreed with what she finally had to do. Her dog can still make sounds, just not loud barking. It was a very difficult decision for her to make.Originally Posted by Loveysmummy
She wouldn't be fined if her dog was inside the house.
If her dog is outside the house and left to bark, again, she should not live with a dog..
The link:http://www.dpi.vic.gov.au/dpi/nrenin...256DEA0027A696This code recognises that debarking a dog may be necessary for therapeutic or prophylactic effects, or as an alternative to euthanasia for a dog declared to be a public nuisance because it barks persistently.
The link:http://www.dpi.vic.gov.au/dpi/nrenin...256DEA0027A696This code recognises that debarking a dog may be necessary for therapeutic or prophylactic effects, or as an alternative to euthanasia for a dog declared to be a public nuisance because it barks persistently.
softpaws? medication?Originally Posted by JulieKit
I think in some very rare cases de-barking is necessary. There may also be a good reason to declaw. Yes, ive said it. Why?
Im on another cat forum, and I was reading up an old post where one of the members HAD to declaw her Devon Rex because he was scratching to the point of mutilating himself. It was not a cosmetic issue, but a serious, health and well being issue.
can you tell me what GOOD, MEDICAL reason there would be to remove a dog's voicebox so he cant express himself anymore?On another subject, I also think there are valid reasons to remove dewclaws, crop or dock. There is a member on my dog forum who had to crop her spaniels ears. Mind you it was not a fashionable crop, more like an amputation, but it was necessary for the health of the dogs. There have been numerous dogs wh have needed there tail amputated because of numerous breaks and injuries.
I believe the reasons have all been mentioned. Even if you dont believe it, debarking is not all about laziness and lack of training. While it may be considered cruel, very rarely it is very necessary. In the case stated before, about the dog who had to be debarked because he was injuring himself, I definately see this as good reason to debark, if of course all other methods have been exhausted. Usually with a dog like this its more of a mental thing, and when they hear themselves bark they get even more riled up, and keep on barking until they are actually hurting themselves. You cut off the bark the dog no longer hears his big bad voice and eventually stops.Originally Posted by arcadian girl
softpaws? medication?
can you tell me what GOOD, MEDICAL reason there would be to remove a dog's voicebox so he cant express himself anymore?
Yes! That was what happened- I was racking my brain, trying to think of why the debarking stopped her dog from injuring her throat further, and last night I finally remembered- she was getting a "payoff" from barking constantly ( a habit aquired because of the abusive home), they couldn't use the no bark collar because of the abuse, the training didn't work, and she finally stopped trying to bark all the time, because there was no "payoff", and she was rehabbed into being a nice, well behaved pet.Originally Posted by JulieKit
Usually with a dog like this its more of a mental thing, and when they hear themselves bark they get even more riled up, and keep on barking until they are actually hurting themselves. You cut off the bark the dog no longer hears his big bad voice and eventually stops.
Cropping and docking are purely cosmetic procedures, if a dog had to have their ears cropped at a later date, due to, I'm guessing chronic ear infections? that is a totally different situation, same as if a dog injured their tail and had to get it amputated. These situations are by no means comparable to the practice of cropping and docking while puppies for physical appearanceOriginally Posted by JulieKit
On another subject, I also think there are valid reasons to remove dewclaws, crop or dock. There is a member on my dog forum who had to crop her spaniels ears. Mind you it was not a fashionable crop, more like an amputation, but it was necessary for the health of the dogs. There have been numerous dogs wh have needed there tail amputated because of numerous breaks and injuries.