BIG cats......

snake_lady

TCS Member
Top Cat
Joined
Dec 9, 2008
Messages
7,218
Purraise
13
Location
ON./Canada
While I admire the thought behind her taking on the orphaned kitties, and trying to avoid extinction, I have to wonder.

Am I not the only one that see's the danger in what she is doing????

She is treating them like harmless pets, rather than wild animals. Heck, I won't even allow my larger snakes to be drapped on people's necks, or my own for that matter, let alone a tiger on my back


Sorry, while I admire the beauty of these cats, I think this woman leaves alot to be desired when it comes to safe handling of exotic animals.... We'll probally read about it later on...maybe yrs down the road... When one of these kitties attacks/injures or kills a person.

(hmmm, maybe this needs to be in IMO)
 

carolina

TCS Member
Top Cat
Joined
Nov 17, 2008
Messages
14,759
Purraise
215
Location
Corinth, TX
It appears to me that she got them as babies, and always raised them inside... She is also a breeder, and the babies are socialized since birth...
Let's wait and see what John (amberthebobcat) has to say about this... I don't think it necessarily means something bad will happen...
I wonder if they are declawed? Will check again.
Also, IMO these are very different from snakes in the sense that they do bond to people quite strongly, understand and show emotions...
 

snake_lady

TCS Member
Top Cat
Joined
Dec 9, 2008
Messages
7,218
Purraise
13
Location
ON./Canada
Originally Posted by carolinalima

Also, IMO these are very different from snakes in the sense that they do bond to people quite strongly, understand and show emotions...
I agree, snakes do not show emotions. But IMO they can bond to people, and they do understand different things. Not to the extent of mammals of course.

Bottom line though, these cats (just like my snakes) are still wild animals and safety should come first. They will always have instincts, and if they kick in, I hope its not on someone doing a wedding photo.

My snakes are all captive bred too (they weren't orphaned in the wild, they are many generations of being bred in captivity) and know me well.... but still go with their natural instincts... take the most recent issue I had, that I posted about a little while ago... I made a mistake.

I am a breeder too. My snakes have been socialised since birth as well


Snakes, tigers, cougars, monkeys, etc. all have one thing in common.... they are wild animals (doesn't matter where they are born). People best learn to respect that fact, and the danger they can impose.

I hope with all my heart, that nothing happens with this lady and her "pets" but.........
 

plebayo

TCS Member
Super Cat
Joined
Sep 24, 2005
Messages
1,089
Purraise
4
Location
Oregon
I'm glad you commented Snake_Lady.

I feel the same way. I know there is a forum member here [amberthebobcat] with wild cats. I however do not believe in owning wild animals and making them into pets. I could see this woman having a sanctuary where they live OUTSIDE in a natural setting with human interaction but I think it is ridiculous to treat them like house cats.

I've seen it be a total disaster with wolves, and wolf hybrids living in the home. It's definitley not for every body, but I personally feel wild animals are more beautiful in the wild doing what they are supposed to do.

Also regardless of snakes vs. big cats, yes wild animals can bond to people but they are STILL WILD. Having a relationship with a wild animal is not even comparable to a relationship with a domestic pet. Especially with a large cat or a wolf, they are still the predator and you can still easily become the prey regardless of your relationship. Domesticated animals depend on us for everything where wild animals have a totally different mentality whether they are raised in captivity or not.
 

goldenkitty45

TCS Member
Top Cat
Joined
Aug 29, 2005
Messages
19,900
Purraise
44
Location
SW Minnesota
Look why happened to Siegfred and Roy - they raised their tigers from babies, and they were attacked by them. The problem is that you HAVE to remember at all times they ARE wild, and to respect that. When you don't, tragic mistakes happen!
 

emy4cats

TCS Member
Super Cat
Joined
Aug 30, 2008
Messages
849
Purraise
1
Location
WA
Originally Posted by GoldenKitty45

Look why happened to Siegfred and Roy - they raised their tigers from babies, and they were attacked by them. The problem is that you HAVE to remember at all times they ARE wild, and to respect that. When you don't, tragic mistakes happen!
That is exactly what I was thinking. Siegfred was lucky to survive that attack.

Even a cub born in captivity has the instinct of it's wild ancestors.
 

bookworm

TCS Member
Alpha Cat
Joined
Jun 16, 2009
Messages
484
Purraise
3
Location
southern u.s.
Originally Posted by Snake_Lady

Snakes, tigers, cougars, monkeys, etc. all have one thing in common.... they are wild animals (doesn't matter where they are born). People best learn to respect that fact, and the danger they can impose.
The same holds true even with feral kittens who have been domestcated. Archie and Mehitable are more affectionate than the normal housecat, but it's all on their terms. Mitty has no problem smacking me with her claws if she doesn't feel she is getting the proper respect. They have a lot of their wild instincts still. Much as I would love to have a friendship with bigger and wilder cats it would take a very special person to live with them, and I doubt I'm that special. Is she? I hope so, time will tell.
 

amberthe bobcat

TCS Member
Top Cat
Joined
Oct 17, 2003
Messages
4,829
Purraise
18
Location
In the Cougars den
Originally Posted by Plebayo

I'm glad you commented Snake_Lady.

I feel the same way. I know there is a forum member here [amberthebobcat] with wild cats. I however do not believe in owning wild animals and making them into pets. I could see this woman having a sanctuary where they live OUTSIDE in a natural setting with human interaction but I think it is ridiculous to treat them like house cats.

I've seen it be a total disaster with wolves, and wolf hybrids living in the home. It's definitley not for every body, but I personally feel wild animals are more beautiful in the wild doing what they are supposed to do.

Also regardless of snakes vs. big cats, yes wild animals can bond to people but they are STILL WILD. Having a relationship with a wild animal is not even comparable to a relationship with a domestic pet. Especially with a large cat or a wolf, they are still the predator and you can still easily become the prey regardless of your relationship. Domesticated animals depend on us for everything where wild animals have a totally different mentality whether they are raised in captivity or not.
Well, some of this is true, but not all. Treating these cats like house cats is not ridiculous at all. My (wild) cats, if that's what we want to call them, are treated the same was as our domestics and bond the very same way. They are not really wild, because they were born and raised in captivity. Our so called domestics still have all the same instincts as my large cats do. However, being a large cat, especially my cougar, you must understand the power and strength these cats have. Most injuries and or accidents are from rough play and NOT being attacked or bitten from the cat thinking we are prey. My cougar for instance, never looks at me as prey. His love and bond with me is much stronger than any cat I have ever owned. My bobcats and cougar have the same mentality as my domestics and in fact, my bobcats are highly protective of my domestics. They want to eat, play and sleep just like my domestics, but yes, they do play rough.
Now, this does not mean I let just anyone play or go in with him. That would be highly irresponsible of me. The only people who go in with him are me and my wife and no one else. I also let no one else come into contact with our bobcats either. Their bond is very strong with us and they are highly protective of us as well. Having the larger cats live in the house is not a good idea however. Our cougar no longer lives inside with us, he has a large outdoor enclosure. The bobcats live inside and also have a secure outdoor enclosure.
Look why happened to Siegfred and Roy - they raised their tigers from babies, and they were attacked by them. The problem is that you HAVE to remember at all times they ARE wild, and to respect that. When you don't, tragic mistakes happen!
Not true at all
They were not attacked. Here is what had happened. Siegfred was in the middle of having a stroke while on stage. His tiger could sense something was wrong. (As I stated, our big cats are very protective of us) The tiger made an attempt to move Siegfred to safety by grabbing him by the back of the neck, just as they would their own cub. However, unlike cats, humans do not have the neck capable of supporting this type of action and that is how Siegfred was injured. He was not attacked and his tiger still lives with him today.
When living with these cats, it does take a great deal of responsibilty. ANY animal, wild or domestic, can bite or act out of control. However, with these powerful cats any bite can be serious due to their size and power. That is why at no time, should anyone other than the owners who lived with and raised the cats, should ever be allowed to interact with them.
 

ut0pia

TCS Member
Top Cat
Joined
Nov 25, 2008
Messages
5,120
Purraise
34
Hmm I am not sure how I feel about this. I look at Jake, he was with me since 5 weeks old, he was a bottle baby for about a week. Now- he is extremely wild and if he had the physical strength i'm sure I'd be dead by now from rough play. I am also sure the entire house would be at ground level if he was bigger. I use soft paws on him but he still chews on furniture as if he's a rodent, and no he's not teething and he climbs on all furniture throwing everything on the floor. This is a cat that has not been around cats ever. Jake is my only cat so he is acting only on instincts. I know that in the case of domestics, being around other domestic cats is good for their socialization...so since Jake never had that he is now crazy and I have to take special care about his socialization and training him to function in our human house. I doubt a big cat would have a different attitude if it had been born in captivity, the only difference would be size and strength- much greater potential for damage. I guess it's possible to make things different if the owner takes a lot of time for training and knows exactly what to do. I dunno...unless this lady knows exactly what she's doing- she's in trouble but it looks like she does know.
 

carolina

TCS Member
Top Cat
Joined
Nov 17, 2008
Messages
14,759
Purraise
215
Location
Corinth, TX
Originally Posted by GoldenKitty45

Look why happened to Siegfred and Roy - they raised their tigers from babies, and they were attacked by them. The problem is that you HAVE to remember at all times they ARE wild, and to respect that. When you don't, tragic mistakes happen!
That was not an attack, according to them themselves.... The Tiger tried to protect him by carrying him out by the neck.
Yes, he was seriously hurt... Yes, they can be dangerous by their shear size...
But.... There are risks in all animals - as we know, a simple bite from our kitty cats can put us in the hospital for many days... If not treated... It can be lethal...
Now, let's put the numbers - how many people have been attacked/hurt by the big cats they raised since little, and how many people have been hurt by their kitty cat?
I think if the raising, socialization and precautions are taken, they can be very safe part of the family...
Everything is relative... Snake_Lady: you have some BIG snakes in there, that can easily hurt you, or your kids, if a mistake is made, or if their instincts kick in, or something else unexpected happens... But you know how to deal with them, and how to take precautions to keep yourself and your family safe... Why do you think that that tiger is any more dangerous than some of the big boas you have?
I would be MUCH more comfortable with a tiger that I raised from a baby than with a huge boa... Anytime... If I could afford, of course

I think it is all relative by what WE think it is dangerous, based on what we are used to, and the usual taboos.
 

bookworm

TCS Member
Alpha Cat
Joined
Jun 16, 2009
Messages
484
Purraise
3
Location
southern u.s.
Knowing the kind of damage my much smaller kitties can do playing, the picture with the tiger on her back was disturbing. They obviousley love her, but there is no way they can understand that a pounce from across the room as an invitation to play could break her back. Despite all the reasons why it probably isn't a good idea to keep so many cats of such size, I must admit, I would love to visit her. Can you imagine a Tiger butting his head against you and snuggling up?
 

cjh27

TCS Member
Alpha Cat
Joined
Mar 6, 2009
Messages
499
Purraise
15
Location
Hamburg, Germany
Originally Posted by AmberThe Bobcat

Not true at all
They were not attacked. Here is what had happened. Siegfred was in the middle of having a stroke while on stage. His tiger could sense something was wrong. (As I stated, our big cats are very protective of us) The tiger made an attempt to move Siegfred to safety by grabbing him by the back of the neck, just as they would their own cub. However, unlike cats, humans do not have the neck capable of supporting this type of action and that is how Siegfred was injured. He was not attacked and his tiger still lives with him today.
... a bit OT, but Sigfried and Roy had their tigers performing on a Las Vegas show, with the tiger standing on a suspended disco ball


Tigers don't belong in a circus or a stage and what they were doing there was disrespectful towards the tigers, out dated and simply WRONG.


regards,

christine
 

keycube

TCS Member
Super Cat
Joined
Nov 26, 2008
Messages
958
Purraise
45
Location
Michigan
This story got me to thinking, what exactly makes an animal "wild"? The two things that come to mind are,

1. Not being socialized with humans, and

2. Having to fight for its survival (food).

It would seem as though having regular food intervals would make the socialization part a hell of a lot easier, particularly once the kitties realize that humans are the ones doing the feeding, eh? And if they're given the space to roam and have some semblance of "freedom", it seems they wouldn't have any claustrophobic desire to lash out and free itself from any "bondage".

I don't purport to know anything about the domestication of big cats, I'm just thinking out loud. But I remember watching a program on cheetahs where a gazelle had stopped running from their chase, and the cheetah stopped as well, confused by this deviation in the routine. "Hmmm, isn't my lunch supposed to run from me? What do I do now?" I thought that spoke volumes regarding what an animals instincts truly are; it seemed as if you took the mechanics of necessity out of their "wild" routine, you could domesticate anything.
 

amberthe bobcat

TCS Member
Top Cat
Joined
Oct 17, 2003
Messages
4,829
Purraise
18
Location
In the Cougars den
It has also been proven that our domestic cats really aren't domesticated after all. They have learned to live with humans, not the same way that dogs were domesticated.
 

snake_lady

TCS Member
Top Cat
Joined
Dec 9, 2008
Messages
7,218
Purraise
13
Location
ON./Canada
Originally Posted by Keycube

This story got me to thinking, what exactly makes an animal "wild"? The two things that come to mind are,

1. Not being socialized with humans, and

2. Having to fight for its survival (food).

It would seem as though having regular food intervals would make the socialization part a hell of a lot easier, particularly once the kitties realize that humans are the ones doing the feeding, eh? And if they're given the space to roam and have some semblance of "freedom", it seems they wouldn't have any claustrophobic desire to lash out and free itself from any "bondage".
You raise some very intelligent thoughts. Most dictonaries define it as similiar. Non-domesticated, living in their natural environment, exhibiting uncontrolled behaviour, and the like.

I would raise the issue of instinct though.

Take John's explanation of Siegfred's tiger. Makes sense, that the tiger was trying to help, but the tiger can not realise that what he was doing was going to cause injury to the human. To me, that is an issue of a "wild" animal. I use the term wild loosely... wild, exotic, originally found in the wild, etc.

I'll even use my snakes for another example.... If one were to be falling, instinct would make the snake constrict whatever was there to stop from hurting itself, whether that be someones neck, leg, furniture, whatever and in the act of constricting, it could easily hurt or kill. Again, to me, that is an issue of a wild animal. ( I can't directly compare snakes and tigers because mammals have emotions, reptiles don't.... I'm just trying to compare the instinct aspect of a wild animal)

I do not know a whole lot about big cats, nor do I claim to. I can only speak on things I've read, heard, seen, etc. I do believe they can become domesticated to a certain degree, and make "pets"....but I can not believe that they would ever loose their natural instincts. Which is why one needs to practice safe exotic keeping/handling.

Why do you think that that tiger is any more dangerous than some of the big boas you have?
Why I personally fear for this woman, is because she is appearing to NOT be practicing safety. That is why I believe that her large cats are way more dangerous than my large boas. I will not argue the fact that my snakes are dangerous..... yes they are. But I am NOT irresponsible enough to do half of the things she does with her cats.

Yes, I have had people take pics with my boas. What you don't see in the pictures is that there are 2 people on either side of the snake (ready to move if the snake gets spooked and constricts) as well as the person holding it, is holding it in front of them, not draped over their neck. That is safety.

I respect and know what damage my animals can do, how long it would take them to do it in, and believe that a fullgrown tiger could cause a heck of a lot more damage that a 6.5ft, 30-45lb boa could do in a much shorter period of time.

But.... There are risks in all animals - as we know, a simple bite from our kitty cats can put us in the hospital for many days... If not treated... It can be lethal...
Now, let's put the numbers - how many people have been attacked/hurt by the big cats they raised since little, and how many people have been hurt by their kitty cat?
I don't think comparing a bite from a pet cat, to fullgrown tigers is fair at all. Sure, pet cats have bacteria that can cause infection....but they lack the size and strength to do even close to the damage a tiger could. Just because they are both felines, raised with humans, does not make an equal comparison.

As for numbers? No way could anyone compare that either. Exotic cats are not commonly kept in the numbers our wee cats are kept. It is not a fair comparison at all. Numbers of people hurt by large cat pets vs people hurt by housecat pets would be like comparing people hurt by a person with a weapon vs people hurt by a person who is a quadrapelegic.


Bottom line for me is responsibility and safety. Whether it be with a tiger, a chimp, a snake, a cat, a dog, a rat......and I can't see half the things she does as safe


Ultimately, only based on that article, I believe that one day something WILL happen.



Hey John, I'm curious.... You mentioned that you are not looked at as prey. I do not know about big cats, this is why I am asking. What would happen if you were at a butcher shop (the smell of the food they eat, was on you) and you weren't recognisable as John (still recognised as a human though)?

The reason I ask is this: My snakes.... eating... they go by scent and heat. (size at times too). Example: if I had a pet rat, played with it, didn't wash my hands, then stuck my hand in one of their cages. My hand would be FOOD because it smelled like a rat, similiar size as a rat, and warm like a rat. The only exception to this would be size.... normal feeding, if I offer something that is too big for them to eat, some of them won't eat it (others will try, then stop...and others will overindulge themselves and end up regurgitating)
 

lilmonkeykeeper

TCS Member
Young Cat
Joined
Feb 4, 2008
Messages
30
Purraise
1
Location
Dallas TX
I work with big cats and primates on a daily basis. These animals have a ton of potential for harm and they are NOT domesticated animals. An animal is domesticated after it has lived with and been altered by humans for hundreds, if not thousands of years. Cats, Dogs, Goats, Sheep etc. all fit this definition. Tigers, Snakes, and even hamsters do not.

These animals are not meant to be pets at this time. Sure, you can handraise them and coo and sweet talk them all you want but the potential is still there and these "pet" exotics are even more dangerous because they have lost their healthy fear of humans. You can claim that they were trying to help (in the case of seigfried) or they were just playing but the truth of the matter is that when they see a sign of weakness, their instinct kicks in and you are dealing with a 200+ lbs animal with sharp teeth, sharp claws and pure unadulterated instinct. This is not a house cat in any way shape or form. Yes we take a risk with any animal we bring into our homes, but the risk is much greater with animals that we can not control and that is still filled with wild instincts.

Where I work, and most reputable organizations that work with exotics, we do not enter the animal's enclosures and have very limited contact with them. This is out of respect for the animal and for everyone's safety. Anytime we need to do something with the animal we either train them through protected contact or we sedate them. We see these animals every day, they know us, some of them have even been handraised, but they would still kill us if given the chance and they are still wild animals. I would not want to enter any of their habitats with them.

Lots of people and institutions take this risk and it is their choice, but I personally feel and it has been proven that is a dangerous risk and I personally feel that it is wrong. It is not supportive of conservation and it is not respectful to these beautiful and wonderful animals. If you want a big, tough looking animal, get a big dog.
 

bookworm

TCS Member
Alpha Cat
Joined
Jun 16, 2009
Messages
484
Purraise
3
Location
southern u.s.
Originally Posted by AmberThe Bobcat

It has also been proven that our domestic cats really aren't domesticated after all. They have learned to live with humans, not the same way that dogs were domesticated.
Living with this many cats I agree completely. No matter how loving they are (and they are) it's totaly on their terms. One seems to see me as her kitten and will pin my arm down to groom me, her brother at still wants a mama and will wake me up at night trying to nurse in my hair. Those two were feral rescues, and the rest aren't quite as extreme, but it's still the same principal. I am allowed to share their lives, but they do not belong to me.
 

ut0pia

TCS Member
Top Cat
Joined
Nov 25, 2008
Messages
5,120
Purraise
34
But, some domestic cats will get used to a pet mouse or hamster and will never try to eat it, while if the cat sees a wild mouse running around it will most definitely eat it. IMO that's how it works with these big cats. I mean I don't see how else it would happen. Humans are to big cats what birds and mice are to our domestics..
 
Top